TOP
Search the Dagstuhl Website
Looking for information on the websites of the individual seminars? - Then please:
Not found what you are looking for? - Some of our services have separate websites, each with its own search option. Please check the following list:
Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI - Logo
Schloss Dagstuhl Services
Seminars
Within this website:
External resources:
  • DOOR (for registering your stay at Dagstuhl)
  • DOSA (for proposing future Dagstuhl Seminars or Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops)
Publishing
Within this website:
External resources:
dblp
Within this website:
External resources:
  • the dblp Computer Science Bibliography


Dagstuhl Seminar 02291

Aesthetic Computing

( Jul 14 – Jul 19, 2002 )

Permalink
Please use the following short url to reference this page: https://www.dagstuhl.de/02291

Organizers




Motivation

This seminar represents an investigation in alternative, cultural and aesthetically-motivated representations for models found in computer science. Example model types include automata networks, flow graphs, software visualization structures, semantic networks, and information graphs. Models serve a variety of purposes from modeling the behavior and dynamics of software, or a physical system, to modeling the static information relations among concepts.

The motivation for the workshop is best seen in light of the wave of rich, personalized sensory modes being made more economic by the perpetual march toward faster and better interfaces. If it were possible to build software models from any material, and with great speed and agility, what new forms of expression would we craft? If the Holodeck from Star Trek were here today, how would we construct these models, or even the fundamental mathematical representations underlying them? An inherent assumption can be drawn that with the right economy for Holodeck-like 3D,immersive environments, we would be building our models much differently than exemplified by the textual and diagrammatic forms populating our existing media.

Cheaper, faster and more expressive methods of representation will burgeon given recent trends in hardware and software, and this will lead to an emergence of aesthetics and artist-driven approaches to model representation. Flat, and relatively standardized textual, modes of communication are present primarily for economic reasons, and as the economies shift, we need to study new modes of expression in mathematics and computer science. Scientific visualizations tend to present output, and not the model structures that, when simulated or executed, drive the output. Aesthetic Computing heralds a new beginning for model representations where art and science come together, with art in direct support of science.

may also be understood to be "Artistic Computing4 or perhaps even "art computer4 to differentiate it from "computer art4---the infusion of artistically motivated representational schemes into models for computing (i.e., art computer) rather than the employment of computing tools in support of creations of pure art (i.e., computer art). A recent graduate seminar course in "aesthetic computing4 was held at the University of Florida.

A short course philosophy page can be found at:

http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~fishwick/cap6836/artcomputer.htm

and the course, itself, is documented at:

http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~fishwick/aescomputing/

These links represent a small indication of what is possible.

Key Themes:

  • Artistic and innovative representations for model structures (i.e., information networks, automata, flow networks, program and data structures)
  • Artistic representations for program behavior (i.e., input/output)
  • Artistic representations for mathematical structure and notation (i.e., algebraic representation)
  • Exploratory Human-Computer Interface methodologies supporting the above representations

More information about the Dagstuhl Seminar on Aesthetic Computing in

http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~fishwick/cap6836/ac.pdf


Participants
  • Neora Berger Shem-Shaul (TAU, IL)
  • Olav W. Bertelsen (Aarhus University, DK)
  • Jay Bolter (Georgia Institute of Technology, US)
  • Willi Bruns (Universität Bremen, DE)
  • Annick Bureaud (Leonardo/Olats - Paris, FR)
  • Stephan Diehl (KU Eichstätt/Ingolstadt, DE) [dblp]
  • Florian Dombois (Fraunhofer Institut -St. Augustin, DE)
  • Achim Ebert (DFKI - Kaiserslautern, DE) [dblp]
  • Ernest Edmonds (Loughborough Univ. of Technology, GB)
  • Karl Entacher (TKS@FH-Salzburg, AT)
  • Paul A. Fishwick (University of Florida - Gainesville, US) [dblp]
  • Susanne Grabowski (Universität Bremen, DE)
  • Hans Hagen (DFKI - Kaiserslautern, DE) [dblp]
  • Volker Höhing (Saarbrücken, DE)
  • Kristiina Karvonen (NOKIA Research Center - Lausanne, CH)
  • John Lee (University of Edinburgh, GB)
  • Jonas Löwgren (Malmö University, SE) [dblp]
  • Roger Malina (CNRS - Marseille, FR)
  • Jon McCormack (Monash University - Clayton, AU) [dblp]
  • Richard Merritt (Luther College - Decorah, US)
  • Boris Müller (Bonn, DE)
  • Jörg Müller (Barcelona, ES)
  • Frieder Nake (Universität Bremen, DE) [dblp]
  • Daniela-Alina Plewe (Berlin, DE)
  • Jane Prophet (University of Westminster, GB)
  • Aaron Quigley (The University of Sydney, AU) [dblp]
  • Rhonda Roland Shearer (Art Science Research Laboratory - New York, US)
  • Steven Schkolne (Caltech - Pasadena, US)
  • Angelika Schulz (HBKS - Saarbrücken, DE)
  • Christa Sommerer (IAMAS - Gifu, JP)
  • Noam Tractinsky (Ben Gurion University - Beer Sheva, IL)