TOP
Suche auf der Schloss Dagstuhl Webseite
Sie suchen nach Informationen auf den Webseiten der einzelnen Seminare? - Dann:
Nicht fündig geworden? - Einige unserer Dienste laufen auf separaten Webseiten mit jeweils eigener Suche. Bitte beachten Sie folgende Liste:
Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI - Logo
Schloss Dagstuhl Services
Seminare
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
  • DOOR (zum Registrieren eines Dagstuhl Aufenthaltes)
  • DOSA (zum Beantragen künftiger Dagstuhl Seminare oder Dagstuhl Perspektiven Workshops)
Publishing
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
dblp
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
  • die Informatik-Bibliographiedatenbank dblp


Dagstuhl-Seminar 24421

SAT and Interactions

( 13. Oct – 18. Oct, 2024 )

(zum Vergrößern in der Bildmitte klicken)

Permalink
Bitte benutzen Sie folgende Kurz-Url zum Verlinken dieser Seite: https://www.dagstuhl.de/24421

Organisatoren

Kontakt

Dagstuhl Reports

As part of the mandatory documentation, participants are asked to submit their talk abstracts, working group results, etc. for publication in our series Dagstuhl Reports via the Dagstuhl Reports Submission System.

  • Upload (Use personal credentials as created in DOOR to log in)

Gemeinsame Dokumente

Programm

Motivation

The problem of deciding whether a propositional formula is satisfiable (SAT) is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science, both theoretically and practically. Due to its practical implications, intensive research has been performed on how to solve SAT problems in an automated fashion, and SAT solving is now a ubiquitous tool to solve many hard problems, both from industry and mathematics.

There are many generalizations of the SAT problem to further logics, including quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs), modal logics, and temporal logics. These logics present even harder satisfiability problems as they are associated with complexity classes such as PSPACE, which encompasses NP. Nevertheless, the last decade has seen the development of practically efficient algorithms for QBFs, SAT modulo theories (SMT), and further logics and their implementation as solvers, which successfully solve huge industrial instances. Since QBFs, SMT, modal logics, and temporal logics can express many practically relevant problems far more succinctly, they apply to even more real-world problems from artificial intelligence, bioinformatics, verification, and planning.

SAT is also increasingly being applied in logics that are not decidable, particularly in the context of first-order theorem proving. Here, fast SAT solvers are used for reasoning sub-tasks and for guiding the theorem provers.

The main aim of this Dagstuhl Seminar is to bring together researchers from different areas of activity on SAT and researchers that work in the field of first-order theorem proving so that they can communicate state-of-the-art advances and embark on a systematic interaction that will enhance the synergy between the different areas.

Copyright Olaf Beyersdorff, Laura Kovács, Meena Mahajan, and Martina Seidl

Teilnehmer

Please log in to DOOR to see more details.

  • Albert Atserias (UPC Barcelona Tech, ES) [dblp]
  • Olaf Beyersdorff (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, DE) [dblp]
  • Ilario Bonacina (UPC Barcelona Tech, ES) [dblp]
  • Florent Capelli (University of Artois/CNRS - Lens, FR) [dblp]
  • Leroy Nicholas Chew (TU Wien, AT) [dblp]
  • Anupam Das (University of Birmingham, GB) [dblp]
  • Susanna de Rezende (Lund University, SE) [dblp]
  • Katalin Fazekas (TU Wien, AT) [dblp]
  • Mathias Fleury (Universität Freiburg, DE) [dblp]
  • Pascal Fontaine (University of Liège, BE) [dblp]
  • Marlene Gründel (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, DE)
  • Clemens Hofstadler (Universität Kassel, DE) [dblp]
  • Kaspar Kasche (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, DE)
  • Phokion G. Kolaitis (University of California - Santa Cruz, US) [dblp]
  • Wietze Koops (Lund University, SE & University of Copenhagen, DK)
  • Konstantin Korovin (University of Manchester, GB) [dblp]
  • Laura Kovács (TU Wien, AT) [dblp]
  • Massimo Lauria (Sapienza University of Rome, IT) [dblp]
  • Meena Mahajan (The Institute of Mathematical Sciences - Chennai, IN) [dblp]
  • Barnaby Martin (Durham University, GB) [dblp]
  • Stefan Mengel (CNRS, CRIL - Lens, FR) [dblp]
  • Claudia Nalon (University of Brasília, BR) [dblp]
  • Jakob Nordström (University of Copenhagen, DK & Lund University, SE) [dblp]
  • Tomáš Peitl (TU Wien, AT) [dblp]
  • Florian Pollitt (Universität Freiburg, DE)
  • Michael Rawson (TU Wien, AT) [dblp]
  • Adrian Rebola-Pardo (TU Wien, AT & Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, AT) [dblp]
  • Rahul Santhanam (University of Oxford, GB) [dblp]
  • Dominik Alban Scheder (TU Chemnitz, DE) [dblp]
  • Tanja Schindler (Universität Basel, CH) [dblp]
  • Stephan Schulz (Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg - Stuttgart, DE) [dblp]
  • Martina Seidl (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, AT) [dblp]
  • Friedrich Slivovsky (University of Liverpool, GB) [dblp]
  • Luc Spachmann (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, DE) [dblp]
  • Martin Suda (Czech Technical University - Prague, CZ) [dblp]
  • Stefan Szeider (TU Wien, AT) [dblp]
  • Neil Thapen (The Czech Academy of Sciences - Prague, CZ) [dblp]
  • Cesare Tinelli (University of Iowa - Iowa City, US) [dblp]
  • Jacobo Torán (Universität Ulm, DE) [dblp]
  • Sophie Tourret (INRIA Nancy - Grand Est, FR) [dblp]
  • Marc Vinyals (University of Auckland, NZ) [dblp]
  • Heribert Vollmer (Leibniz Universität Hannover, DE) [dblp]
  • Andrei Voronkov (University of Manchester, GB) [dblp]

Verwandte Seminare
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 12471: SAT Interactions (2012-11-18 - 2012-11-23) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 16381: SAT and Interactions (2016-09-18 - 2016-09-23) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 20061: SAT and Interactions (2020-02-02 - 2020-02-07) (Details)

Klassifikation
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Complexity
  • Logic in Computer Science

Schlagworte
  • satisfiability problems
  • computational and proof complexity
  • combinatorics
  • first-order logic
  • solvers for satisfiability problems
  • non-classical logics